Climate model exposes serious errors in complex computer models


Peer-reviewed pocket-calculator climate model exposes serious errors in complex computer models.

Something that has been noted before. The IPCC models are prone to exaggeration not supported by the evidence. But, note, it’s still getting f***ing hot and more CO2 is bad news for a lot of marine life. There’s still reasons to reduce fossil-fuels dependence (not least being dependent on their supply from oppressive regimes.) Lord Monckton has been a long-time opponent of Climate Alarmism – not denial that it’s happening, but that it’s as catastrophic as claimed. And he’s probably right. But – note this caveat – just because the global picture isn’t as extreme as portrayed, that doesn’t mean we’re not getting *more* weather chaos. Extremes come from perturbing the system and this is reason enough to wean ourselves off burning stuff for energy.

Galileo-style Uranus Tour (2003) | WIRED


Galileo-style Uranus Tour (2003) | WIRED.

Uranus deserves more attention. There’s something weird about its insides – it should be radiating more heat than it does, but something deep inside keeps it bottled up. Plus its moons are fascinating. An Orbiter, as Dave Portree ably discusses, should be able to use the moons for orbit changes just like the “Galileo” mission did during its 1995-2003 sojourn at Jupiter.

The paper outlining the mission is available here: Feasibility of a Galileo-Style Tour of the Uranian Satellites

Next Big Future: Aragoscope could achieve x1000 higher resolution than Hubble Telescope


Next Big Future: Aragoscope is space telescope system that could achieve 1000 times higher resolution than Hubble Telescope.

Hubble presently resolves Eris into a ~1 pixel wide image (Eris is 2,326 km across and Hubble resolves a spot 1,875 km wide at Eris’s distance), so an Aragoscope would image Eris to a ~1,000 pixel image – thus ~2 km/pixel resolution. Unlike Pluto, there’s no “New Horizons” winging its way to image Eris.


We could scan the moons of Jupiter at better than Galileo resolution. At just 4 AU, when closest to Earth, we’d see Europa to the ~0.1 km/pixel level. What does that mean? This is Europa at 1 miles (1.6 km) per pixel…


The moons of Uranus and Neptune would be imaged to the ~same level as the above image of Europa. What’s more they can be studied at leisure, rather than the frantic scramble of a high speed flyby.

Mars can be monitored at the 10 metre/pixel level. Not as good as the rovers on the ground, but a decent bird’s-eye view.

Finally the mysterious possible planets out beyond Neptune, at ~200 to ~250 AU, would be resolved in considerable detail – but first we have to find them.

Just How Special is the Solar System?

Crab Nebula

Alien DUST found at the bottom of the Earth’s ocean | Daily Mail Online.

The punchline is that regular Supernova may not be sufficient to make the heavier elements, like Uranium and Thorium (U & T), that provide much of Earth’s, and other Solar System objects, their long term radiogenic warming. Of course there’s still Potassium 40 (K-40) in other parts of the Galaxy, but if most Supernova debris contains 1% the expect U & T then there’s something different about the supernova that seeded our Solar System with its radioactive isotopes.

The Milky Way – a ‘galactic transport system’

Milky Way Wormhole

In theory, the Milky Way could be a ‘galactic transport system’.

Work by Peter Kuhfittig and colleagues suggests that the “dark mass” of our Galaxy and the super-mass in the Core could be wormholes.

Preprint here:

Possible existence of wormholes in the central regions of halos

Kuhfittig has discussed wormholes in the Halo in a series of wormhole papers: arXiv search

Gravitational lensing of wormholes in the galactic halo region

Possible existence of wormholes in the galactic halo region

Accelerated Travels

Accelerated Travels.

A mathematical discussion of accelerated motion in the relativistic universe. Has some peculiar features when the acceleration is constant – in other discussions this is called the Rindler space-time. The Rindler Horizon forms behind the accelerating observer and strangeness can ensue… at least strange to our Earth-bound eyes.