Systemic

Megabytes of astronomical data are collected every second by automated probes and telescopes around the world, but finding something meaningful and new in that torrent is quite laborious. One effort enlisting the power of distributed intelligence (i.e. you & me, and our computers) a team of astrophysicists are trying to extract traces of new extrasolar planets from radial velocity observations of nearby(ish) stars… this is Systemic. Dowload their Systemic Console and the program lets you tweak the possible orbits of possible planets to inch towards better statistical fits – and in the process you might find even more planets, hidden in the “noise”. Even more importantly you might find a planet which can be detected by its transits across the face of its star – several planets are known by their shadows. In the next few years it’s highly likely that an Earth-sized planet will be “seen” in this negative fashion, probably around a red-dwarf star.

But what has been found already? The most complete reference for extrasolar planets is Jean Schneider’s The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia which is as up-to-date as humanly possible – Jean’s found a few himself, so he’s definitely got his finger on the pulse of discovery. Not counting your own discoveries via Systemic, that is…

Ocean Planets… soon

If Neptune was a bit cooler then it would have a deep ocean full of dissolved hydrogen, instead of what’s probably a super-critical atmosphere of dense “vapour”. According to modelling, by Sloane Wiktorowicz and Andrew Ingersoll, Voyager’s gravity data for Neptune rules out an ocean, which would be denser at a shallower depth than an all vapour atmosphere. Yet there’s a chance that Voyager tracking wasn’t quite as precise as certainty in this matter requires, so Neptune might yet be an Ocean Planet.

Ocean planets are a fairly new idea, based on advanced modelling of the Equations of State of silicates, ice and iron/nickel. Basically the planets are heavy enough to fully differentiate according to the density of their most common elements and compounds – volatiles on top, silicates in-between and dense iron-nickel alloy in the Core. The most common volatile is, of course, water, followed by carbon dioxide (after methane decomposes) which dissolves and precipitates into a layer within the water. Thing with water is that it forms a huge range of ices. We know ice as amorphous ice and crystalline ice, but under sufficient pressure liquid water will form (mostly) Ice VII, which can remain solid up to quite high temperatures (its triple point at 22,000 atmospheres is at 85 degrees C.) While thousands of atmospheres of pressure isn’t achieved anywhere in Earth’s oceans an Ocean Planet is half ocean, which means Ice VII (and higher pressure phases of ice) forms a thick, dense mantle surrounding the inner silicate mantle and the core.

What results is a liquid ocean about 100 km deep, a layer of carbonate, then Ice VII beneath that for thousands of kilometres. The atmosphere can be H/He, but if the planet is small enough it might not capture a lot of primordial gas, and instead it may out-gas the standard chondritic mix recently determined by geochemical analysis – methane, ammonia, nitrogen and hydrogen. Both the methane and ammonia will eventually be oxidised by reacting with oxygen produced by photolysis of the water, making more water, nitrogen and carbon dioxide. On a smaller world an aerosol of longer hydrocarbons would form a haze protecting the ammonia and methane somewhat, but a larger world’s atmosphere would wash it out before it could accumulate.

Would Life find a foothold on such a world? You might think that so much water meant an idyllic environment for life, but in reality oceans are vast deserts with a very thin veneer of life. Most of the action happens in shallow seas and lakes, something lacking on an Ocean Planet. Yet I can’t shake the thought that methanogenic life might not cause a different outcome for carbon on such a world, turning it into eventually a slick of hydrocarbons, instead of deeply buried and dissolved carbonates. But I very much doubt animal life and an oxygen biosphere.

As PhysOrg News has noted Ocean Planets may be detectable very soon.

Wormholes and Singularity

Wormholes are general relativistic short-cuts through space-time, currently unobserved, but made famous (or infamous) by Star Trek, Stargate and Sliders, and little understood. Originally described by Einstein and others – famously the Einstein-Rosen bridge mentioned briefly in SF ever since – but shown to be dynamically unstable to any infalling light or mass. That is until Carl Sagan challenged his friend Kip Thorne to come up with someway of making wormholes stable. Ever since that famous thought-experiment wormholes have been described and designed in a multitude of physics papers – but do they exist?

Nikolai Kardashev and Igor Novikov are instantly recognisable names to space-nerds like myself – inventor of the Kardashev scale of civilisations, and master of black holes respectively. Just recently they’ve collaborated on a paper… Astrophysics of Wormholes …which describes what wormholes, in varying states of traversibility, might look like. And infact they’d look a lot like the Active Galactic Nucleii of many, many galaxies.

Another team of researchers have also suggested a different way to find wormholes – inside Black Holes. A Black Hole is usually described as “sucking in everything” like some sort of irresistable force, but in actual Black Hole physics the picture is more complicated. From a distance a bare Black Hole is just a mass with gravity like any other – but invisible (and thus a candidate for dark matter) -, but within a few radii of the Black Hole (its radii not yours) the situation gets dramatic. Small Black Holes have immense tidal forces and will shred anything into atoms. Within 3 radii and the Black Hole does strange things to space-time – if it’s rotating then space-time gets dragged with it, creating an ergosphere. Nothing can resist turning with the Black Hole within the ergosphere, but dumping mass into it might give you enough energy to escape back out. A similar process allows Hawking Radiation to escape and whittle away the mass of a Black Hole over immense aeons of aeons of time.

But within the Event Horizon there’s no escape, not even for light. Space & time trade places and all motion is towards the Singularity, where the mass of the original object that formed the Black Hole has been crushed to oblivion leaving a distortion in space-time. A rotating Black Hole has a Singularity shaped like a ring – and if you can pass through the ring you’ve passed through a wormhole. One that’s normally inaccessible. However according to recent computations of the effects of an electromagnetic excitation of the Black Hole, found here… Electromagnetic Excitation of Rotating Black Holes and Relativistic Jets …the Event Horizon can be opened up and the wormhole revealed. Perhaps if the wormhole goes somewhere this might actually be useful.

And that’s the puzzle. Relativity gives no clear indication of where wormholes end. They might link to other places (and times) in our Universe or in other Universes. When the worm-ways of the Universe are finally explored there will be a whole new breed of adventurers required to travel to their far-ends, risking being lost in a wholly other Universe and time. After hardy explorers have mapped the wormhole network of the Universe what will happen then?

According to Ray Kurzweil they’ll be the communications web of the The Intelligent Universe, our ultimate descendent, the Universe-filling HyperComputer, which will include us within its matrix. His is a grand cosmic vision in which the super-exponential growth in computation will drive us to turn the Universe into Mind-full Computronium and live in a virtual world that caters to our whims. If we aren’t already there…

Daedalus Time Budget

Event Time (seconds) Mass (tons) Acceleration (m/s2)
Light up 0 54026.2 0.14
First Tank drop 2.1570E+07 38205.9 0.197
Second Tank drop 4.3140E+07 22355.5 0.337
Third Tank depletion 6.4700E+07 6795.2 1.109
Second stage 6.4700E+07 5098.2 0.13
First Tank drop 9.2450E+07 3014.8 0.22
Second Tank drop 1.2030E+08 981.6 0.676
Manoeuvre begins 0.0000E+00 931.5 0.712
Manoeuvre ends 5.5500E+05 656.5 1.01

Takes a bit of explaining, but the table is really in two parts. When the probe is nearing its target it manoeuvres around to place its sub-probes for the best fly-bys of interesting targets in the system, spreading them around far and wide. Each sub-probe has a dust-bug to put out a protective dust-cloud to ionise any meteoroids that might otherwise ram into it – something virtually certain as Daedalus plows through interplanetary space at 12.2 % of lightspeed.